The US dollar has been at the mercy of a single factor as war spirals in the Middle East: the price of oil.
In just a week, a historic surge in energy prices brought on by the US-Israeli attack on Iran has upended inflation and growth outlooks across the world. That includes the US, where Treasury prices have been sinking. The dollar, nonetheless, has marched higher. It’s rise has been catalyzed by the US’ position as the world’s top oil producer and by the dollar’s role as the currency for global crude trade, said traders and strategists.
Bloomberg’s dollar gauge is up nearly 1% since the launch of US and Israeli strikes on Iran on Feb 28. The greenback has rallied against all peers except the Canadian and Australian dollars, two currencies also highly linked to global energy prices. Brent crude oil futures have gained about 25%, meanwhile. As a result, a measure of the near-term correlation between oil and the dollar turned sharply positive this March.
“The market has quickly realized that only a couple of trades work,” said Nathan Thooft, a senior portfolio manager at Manulife Investment Management. “Those are oil and the dollar.”
A Bloomberg analysis of activity in the options market tells a similar story. Some 60% of the activity observed this week in euro-dollar derivatives via the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation was placed on bets that the dollar would rise against the euro. The average in January and February, conversely, was around 60% in favor of the euro. The shift likely reflects a market increasingly focused on the single currency’s exposure to energy imports.
“We continue to think in terms of the opportunities in oil economies versus non-oil economies,” Thierry Wizman, a global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Group, wrote Tuesday.
The dollar’s recent surge partly reverses a trend that’s been in place since President Donald Trump’s inauguration: dollar depreciation prompted in part by broader uncertainty surrounding US trade and economic policies. Despite the recent gains, Bloomberg’s dollar measure is still down some 6% over the last 12 months.
Before the war started, the greenback was often negatively correlated with oil, trading down as oil prices rose, said Nicholas Wall, head of global FX strategy at JPMorgan Asset Management. Since the Feb. 28 bombing, however, oil prices and the greenback have been rising in tandem, prompting some to refer to the currency as a petrodollar.
The trend continued on Tuesday, as the Bloomberg dollar index fell 0.4% while the price of global benchmark Brent crude fell nearly 14.7%.
Still, the longer the conflict in the Middle East continues, the more sensitive US consumers, long attuned to prices at the pump, will be to rising oil prices. That could ultimately dent future growth in the United States just as it will in other major economies around the world, which could be a drag on the currency’s strength in the longer term.
“It’s a relative strength story, but I wouldn’t go so far as to say that the US dollar is a ‘petrodollar,’” said Kathy Jones, the head of fixed-income strategy at Charles Schwab. “The US economy will likely see a decline in GDP growth as a result of higher energy prices that affect consumer spending, so it isn’t a net positive overall.”
What Bloomberg strategists say…
“Oil is priced in dollars, global trade is financed in dollars and a vast stock of offshore liabilities is denominated in the greenback. When crude spikes, it is effectively a direct demand shock for the currency at the core of the petrodollar complex.”
-Brendan Fagan, MLIV Strategist
For the full post, click here.
Macro investors are increasingly torn as they consider both the price shocks of surging oil as well as the looming hit to global growth, said Christopher Gunster, head of fixed income at Fidelis Capital Partners. The market is selling Treasuries and buying dollars, he noted, which is a counterintuitive effect of the war.
“You’re seeing the fight-to-quality and the inflationary impacts conflict with each other,” Gunster said.
With assistance from Alice Gledhill.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
